Abstract
BACKGROUND:
High-protein diets have been shown to increase energy expenditure (EE).
OBJECTIVE:
The
objective was to study whether a high-protein, carbohydrate-free diet
(H diet) increases gluconeogenesis and whether this can explain the
increase in EE.
DESIGN:
Ten
healthy men with a mean (+/-SEM) body mass index (in kg/m(2)) of 23.0
+/- 0.8 and age of 23 +/- 1 y received an isoenergetic H diet (H
condition; 30%, 0%, and 70% of energy from protein, carbohydrate, and
fat, respectively) or a normal-protein diet (N condition; 12%, 55%, and
33% of energy from protein, carbohydrate, and fat, respectively) for 1.5
d according to a randomized crossover design, and EE was measured in a
respiration chamber. Endogenous glucose production (EGP) and fractional
gluconeogenesis were measured via infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose and
ingestion of (2)H(2)O; absolute gluconeogenesis was calculated by
multiplying fractional gluconeogenesis by EGP. Body glycogen stores were
lowered at the start of the intervention with an exhaustive
glycogen-lowering exercise test.
RESULTS:
EGP
was lower in the H condition than in the N condition (181 +/- 9
compared with 226 +/- 9 g/d; P < 0.001), whereas fractional
gluconeogenesis was higher (0.95 +/- 0.04 compared with 0.64 +/- 0.03; P
< 0.001) and absolute gluconeogenesis tended to be higher (171 +/-
10 compared with 145 +/- 10 g/d; P = 0.06) in the H condition than in
the N condition. EE (resting metabolic rate) was greater in the H
condition than in the N condition (8.46 +/- 0.23 compared with 8.12 +/-
0.31 MJ/d; P < 0.05). The increase in EE was a function of the
increase in gluconeogenesis (DeltaEE = 0.007 x Deltagluconeogenesis -
0.038; r = 0.70, R(2) = 0.49, P < 0.05). The contribution of
Deltagluconeogenesis to DeltaEE was 42%; the energy cost of
gluconeogenesis was 33% (95% CI: 16%, 50%).
CONCLUSIONS:
Forty-two
percent of the increase in energy expenditure after the H diet was
explained by the increase in gluconeogenesis. The cost of
gluconeogenesis was 33% of the energy content of the produced glucose.
No comments:
Post a Comment